Brooks Wealth Management LLC (BWM)

The Market’s Sharpest Test Came Early This chart captures the emotional center of the 2025 market. Between mid-February and early April, the S&P 500 fell roughly 21 percent. The decline was sharp, fast, and unsettling. It felt like something had broken. Headlines turned urgent, volatility spiked, and many investors questioned whether a deeper downturn was unfolding. Just as quickly, the narrative flipped. From the early-April low, the market rallied more than 30 percent into early summer, erasing the entire drawdown and pushing to new highs. By mid-year, what felt like a crisis had become a footnote. What made this episode defining was not the size of the move, but the speed. There was very little time to react thoughtfully. Investors who sold in fear were forced to make a second decision almost immediately: when to get back in. The lesson from this chart is uncomfortable but consistent with market history. The most stressful periods often coincide with the best long-term entry points. In 2025, patience and discipline mattered far more than prediction, and the market rewarded those who resisted the urge to act on fear alone. Bonds Did What They Were Supposed To Do In 2025, stocks clearly won the performance race. The S&P 500 finished the year up nearly 18 percent, a strong result by any historical standard. At the same time, broad bond ETFs delivered a positive return of just over 7 percent. On the surface, this chart looks simple. Stocks went up more than bonds. End of story. But that misses the point. What makes this chart important is not the difference in returns, but the difference in experience. Early in the year, stocks suffered a sharp and uncomfortable drawdown. Bonds did not. While equities fell quickly, bonds held steady and continued to grind higher. By the end of the year, bonds were not competing with stocks for headline performance. They were doing what they are meant to do: providing balance, liquidity, and emotional confidence when markets get noisy. The lesson from this chart is straightforward. Diversification is not about maximizing returns in the best years. It is about staying invested through the hardest parts of the year so you are still around to benefit when markets recover. In 2025, bonds played that role. Leadership Shifted Beyond the U.S. For years, U.S. stocks dominated global markets, making international investing feel optional. In 2025, that narrative changed. This chart compares returns across four broad regions: U.S. stocks, international developed markets, emerging markets, and the global market as a whole. By year-end, emerging markets and international stocks excluding the U.S. delivered returns north of 30 percent, far outpacing U.S. stocks. What makes this chart notable is not just the outperformance, but how quietly it happened. There was no single headline or dominant theme driving international markets. Instead, gains were spread across regions and sectors, often overlooked as investor attention remained focused on U.S. technology. The lesson here is a familiar one, but easy to forget. Market leadership rotates. The areas that feel unexciting or unnecessary can become meaningful contributors when expectations are low. In 2025, global diversification mattered again. Market Leadership Continues to Narrow In 2025, the stock market delivered a solid headline return, with the S&P 500 finishing the year up ~18 percent. At first glance, that suggests broad strength. This chart shows why the reality was more complicated. It breaks the index into three pieces: the full S&P 500, the seven largest companies often referred to as the Magnificent Seven, and the remaining 493 stocks. The difference between them was meaningful. The Magnificent Seven gained more than 22 percent for the year but experienced extreme volatility along the way, including a drawdown of more than 25 percent. The other 493 stocks posted a much more modest gain of about 13 percent and moved far more steadily. The quiet lesson of this chart is about tradeoffs. Concentration boosted returns but increased risk. Diversification smoothed the ride but lagged the winners. The AI Arms Race Hit the Balance Sheet In 2025, artificial intelligence stopped being just a story and started showing up clearly in financial statements. This chart tracks capital spending by major technology companies alongside NVIDIA’s data center revenue. The relationship is direct. As companies like Amazon, Alphabet, Microsoft, Meta, and Oracle increased spending on data centers and infrastructure, NVIDIA’s data center revenue surged. The takeaway from this chart is simple. 2025 marked the moment when AI shifted from narrative to execution. Whether every dollar spent earns an attractive return remains uncertain, but the level of commitment made AI one of the defining investment themes of the year. Nvidia Became the Largest Company in the World Over a short period of time, Nvidia’s market capitalization surged past long-established leaders like Apple, Microsoft, and Alphabet, briefly reaching the $5 trillion mark. That kind of move is rare. It reflects not just strong stock performance, but a dramatic shift in how investors valued Nvidia’s role in the global economy. What made this rise notable was speed and scale. Nvidia was not simply growing alongside its peers. It was separating from them. While other mega-cap technology companies continued to grow steadily, Nvidia’s valuation accelerated as demand for AI-related computing power reshaped expectations for future earnings. Gold Reflected a Quiet Loss of Confidence In 2025, gold made a move that was hard to ignore. This chart compares three forces moving at the same time: the price of gold, the U.S. dollar, and the growth of the money supply. Over the year, gold rose more than 60 percent, while the U.S. dollar declined and the money supply continued to expand to new highs. The relationship is not perfect or mechanical, but the signal is clear. As more dollars entered the system and the purchasing power of the dollar weakened, investors gravitated toward assets perceived as stores of value. Gold benefited from that shift. What makes this chart notable is that gold did not surge during a market panic. Stocks performed well in 2025. Risk appetite was generally healthy. And yet, gold still rallied aggressively in the background. That suggests the move was less about fear and more about long-term confidence in currency stability. The takeaway is subtle but important. Markets can be strong while underlying concerns quietly build. In 2025, gold reflected a growing awareness that monetary expansion has consequences, even when everything else appears to be working just fine. Rate Cuts Came Without a Crisis For most of 2025, investors waited for interest rate cuts. By year-end, they finally arrived. This chart shows three key forces moving together: the Federal Reserve’s policy rate, inflation, and unemployment. The Federal Funds Rate stayed elevated through much of the year before gradually moving lower. Inflation cooled but remained sticky, settling near the mid-2 percent range. Unemployment drifted higher, but only modestly, ending the year around 4.4 percent. What stands out is what didn’t happen. There was no sharp spike in unemployment and no collapse in inflation. The economy slowed just enough to give the Fed room to ease, without breaking. That combination mattered. Markets had spent years conditioned to expect rate cuts only during recessions or financial stress. In 2025, cuts came during a period of relative stability. The takeaway from this chart is Monetary policy does not always respond to crisis. Sometimes it responds to balance. Crypto Progress Continued Without Price Confirmation In 2025, cryptocurrency once again reminded investors that price and progress are not the same thing. This chart shows the price movement of Bitcoin and Ethereum over the year. Both finished lower, with Bitcoin down modestly and Ethereum down more aggressively. Despite weak returns, crypto continued to embed itself more deeply into the financial system. Institutional custody expanded, regulatory clarity improved, and usage moved quietly into the background of payments, settlement, and infrastructure. The volatility remained, but the technology did not disappear. What made this chart defining is the disconnect it highlights. Adoption does not always show up immediately in prices. Markets can move sideways or down even as systems mature. The takeaway is not a bullish or bearish call. It is a reminder that emerging technologies often progress unevenly. In 2025, crypto’s relevance grew even as its prices struggled, reinforcing the difference between long-term development and short-term speculation. History Never Lacked Reasons to Sell This chart compresses more than three decades of market history into a single, uncomfortable lesson. Overlayed on the long-term growth of the S&P 500 are many of the moments that felt, at the time, like obvious reasons to sell. Recessions. Financial crises. Political turmoil. Wars. Pandemics. Inflation spikes. Rate hikes. Each event came with convincing narratives explaining why this time was different. And yet, the market moved higher. That does not mean markets rise in a straight line or that downturns do not matter. The gray bands remind us that recessions were real and painful. Drawdowns were real. Fear was justified in the moment. What this chart shows, however, is that the biggest risk for long-term investors has rarely been staying invested during uncertainty. It has been believing that uncertainty itself is a reliable signal to exit. The reason this chart defines 2025 is not because 2025 was uniquely difficult. It is because it reminded investors, once again, that markets climb through chaos, not after it clears. Discipline, not foresight, has always been the more reliable strategy. Disclosure This material is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute personalized investment, tax, or legal advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Investing involves risk, including the potential loss of principal. Brooks Wealth Management LLC is a registered investment adviser. Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training. Charts and data shown are based on publicly available sources believed to be reliable but are not guaranteed for accuracy or completeness. Any references to market performance, asset classes, or investment strategies are general in nature and may not be appropriate for all investors. Decisions regarding individual investments should be made in the context of a client’s full financial picture, objectives, and risk tolerance.
Scroll to Top